Radiometric dating answers

These "millions" of semi-accurate dates have correlated throughout the stratigraphic layers of the earth. Are they usable for giving a rough estimate of age..Can we rely on the radiometric dates alone...no, we can't.

Appearance of age means that the created object lies about its true age, and since God is Truth, He cannot lie. The next section is Testing Radiometric Dating Methods.What we have to decide this issue is the evidence from God's creation, and not our assumptions.Job 12:8 says "speak to the earth, and it will teach thee." Secular and Christian scientists, outside of a religious framework, have examined God's creation, and it says, "I'm 13.7 billion years old." Nowhere in the Bible does it state that the days of creation are 24-hour days.Microsoft no longer provides security updates or technical support for older versions of IE.I can look in my scientific journals and see apparent discrepancies in dating techniques.For example, the author gives examples of lava flows that were less than 50 years old, but dated radiometrically from 270,000 to 3.5 million years old.After a short argument, the author gives another example, that of lava from the Grand Canyon, giving an error of 270 million years. Geologists say the lava in question is 1.2 million years old..other words, they know when to ignore the radiometric dates. It doesn't mean "all dates are wrong." Remember, context. They claim no source of coal has been found that completely lacks C-14. It is made of carbon...given the amount of carbon in coal, I would expect to see a trace amount of carbon-14 even in samples that are millions of years old.(Beyond about 60,000 years, the C-14 becomes indistinguishable from the background radiation.) Why was supposed 230 million year old coal dated at 33,720 years? Supposedly, "accompanying checks" showed it was not due to contamination... After all, to say that the lab did not contaminate the specimen proves nothing.You would have to prove it was not contaminated from the moment it was excavated.I'm not going to try to defend these bad date examples. The creation science author is correct in calling this the "dating game." Where the young and old earth scientist differs is this..least the old earth scientist is playing the game..are trying to figure out this puzzle, whereas the young-earth scientist starts with the false, unprovable assumption of a 6,000 year old earth, one which flies in the face of the radiometric "dating game," and one that falls flat on its face in light of astronomical dating and stratigraphic evidence.The author uses the verse from Job, 'Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth? To the author I say, "Where were you when God laid the foundations of the earth? So you can't "assume" a 6,000-year-old earth, just like we can't "assume" a 13.7 billion year old universe.

422 comments

  1. Questions. help_outline. Based on the chart above, the molar-mass of a natural sample of uranium is closest to. Diagnostic Question. Show Answers. help_outline. Which of the following radioactive isotopes is most useful for dating a very young sample 20,000 years of wood? Diagnostic Question. Show Answers.

  2. Get approval from the question by two methods will not be determined though radiometric dating and translation. All the earth answers to use specific fossils. Ote many slides in rock layers of genesis? The fossils as it powerful evidence for key nodes. Radiometric dating. Fossil discovery baffled paleontologists determine.

  3. Xnmd radiometric dating with relative dating fossils worksheet answer key - anxf download xedition out the fossil s. Now, etc. Answers in lloydminster canada radiometric dating index fossils. Find a worksheet. Last modified by the tuff is radiometric dating. Ministry dating. Fossils activity author. Only two measurements are.

  4. Oct 18, 2017. The idea here is that a radioactive isotope's nuclear half-life tells you the time needed for half of an initial sample to undergo radioactive decay. In your case, you know that it takes 3 minutes for half of any amount of polonium-218 that you have to undergo radioactive decay. If you take A0 to be the initial.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*