Which of the following is a valid statement regarding the task of managing policies in e PO 4.0? The only way to apply an existing policy to a node in the e PO tree is through inheritance. When you assign a new policy to a particular node of the Directory, then all systems under that node with inheritance intact will inherit the new policy. Policies that have been duplicated can only be applied to the Directory level in the e PO console. Policies can be exported or imported from one e PO server to another e PO server. FILL IN THE BLANKS - Communications between Tomcat and the Web browser accessing the e PO console is accomplished using _______ traffic through port _______ by default.
By default, which of the following is the communication port between e PO console and e PO server in e PO 4.0?
Plus Marta admits that she loves Lady Gaga and an iconic rock & roll band.
:))) Wow - I have to correct myself: PLENTY of MP3 files have been ERASED, too!
Chronic kidney disease is identified by a blood test for creatinine, which is a breakdown product of muscle metabolism.
What are the default ports for communicating from the e PO agent, console, and sensor to the e PO server? This passage related to the change of attributes, but did not disclose the deletion of data subject to the database change indicating a modification of the corresponding field.The Board drew the appellant's attention to the following prior art and explained its relevance: D6: US2005/149582 published on 7 July 2005.Claim 1 of the main request reads as follows:"A method of updating and backing up a database (40, 42, 44) comprising data records, to accord with an updated database schema defining un [sic] updated structure of the data records in the database (40, 42, 44), wherein the database (40, 42, 44) is associated with mail store content, the method comprising:obtaining (100) at a portable electronic device (22) the updated database schema associated with the database (40, 42, 44);comparing the updated database schema (106) with a previous database schema associated with the database (40, 42, 44), to determine database schema changes;generating an update command (108) based on said comparing (106), when the updated database schema differs from said previous database schema, said update command comprising said database schema changes;updating the data records (110) of the database (40, 42, 44) according to the update command (108) by:deleting a first field from each of the data records, if said database schema changes comprise a deletion of said first field of the data records;deleting data stored in a second field in each of the data records, if said database schema changes comprise a modification of said second field of the data records; andadding a new field in each of the data records, if said database schema changes comprise an addition of said new field of the data records; andtransmitting said update command (112) from said portable electronic device (22) to a server by way of a radio communication channel, said update command for enabling updating of a backup database (34, 36, 38) associated with the database (40, 42, 44) at the server, by performing the steps deleting a first field, deleting data and adding a new field on backup data records of the backup database (34, 36, 38) according to the update command, so that each of the backup data records of the backup database (34, 36, 38) conforms to the updated structure as defined by the updated database schema."Claims 2 to 10 of the main request are dependent on claim 1.The applicant (appellant), whose name at the time was Research In Motion Limited, appealed against the decision of the Examining Division refusing European patent application No.In particular, the Examining Division pointed to phase 3 of Fig.Feature F5 was not disclosed in section 10.4.2 of D5 cited by the Examining Division.In view of these distinguishing features, the appellant proposed to formulate the objective technical problem as "how to synchronise database schemas of an email database at a portable electronic device and a backup server over a bandwidth-limited and intermittent wireless link" (features F1 and F6).This objective technical problem was solved by generating an update command comprising the plurality of database schema changes (feature F3).In the written proceedings the Examining Division also cited the following prior-art documents: D1: US2005/120123 published on 2 June 2005, D2: US2005/071344 published on 31 March 2005, D3: US2004/224675 published on 11 November 2004, D4: Marco Mesiti et al.: "X-Evolution: A System for XML Schema Evolution and Document Adaptation", 10th International Conference on Extending Database Technology, Munich, Germany, 26-31 March, 2006, LNCS 3896, published on 31 March 2006.With the statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant submitted a new main request and new first and second auxiliary requests.